From: Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Elaboration checks
Date: 2000/02/15
Date: 2000-02-15T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <88bk0i$bku$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 38A85CC1.8E5DF76@averstar.com
In article <38A85CC1.8E5DF76@averstar.com>,
Tucker Taft <stt@averstar.com> wrote:
> You should definitely talk with Rational about this.
> If you are placing the suppress pragmas properly, then there
> should be no overhead for elaboration checking.
But that's what he reported! He said that the program got 15%
smaller once he put in the suppress pragmas, his concern is
with the overhead when the checks are NOT suppressed!
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-02-15 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-02-13 0:00 Elaboration checks Martin Dowie
2000-02-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-02-13 0:00 ` Martin Dowie
2000-02-14 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
2000-02-13 0:00 ` Jeff Creem
2000-02-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
2000-02-14 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox