From: larry@VLSI.JPL.NASA.GOV
Subject: Criticism of Ada
Date: 21 Nov 88 22:42:28 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <881121144228.1a27@VLSI.JPL.NASA.GOV> (raw)
Can we all agree not to waste time and space on the recent attack on Ada
posted from the C++ news group? None of the points are new, several are
flatly wrong, all the rest have been intelligently rebutted here at least
half a dozen times.
This is not meant to denigrate C++ itself. As a C enthusiast who well knows
its problems, I'm very happy with Bjarne Stroustrup's work. I recommend C++
to other C programmers who've matured enough to want something better than C,
and to the increasingly fewer project managers who're still afraid of Ada.
Nor is this meant to fend off suggested improvements of Ada inspired by C++,
Objective C, Eiffel, SmallTalk, or whatever. But I refuse to listen to
anyone who doesn't understand that nothing is perfect and that design
decisions ALWAYS involve trade-offs.
Larry @ VLSI.JPL.NASA.GOV
next reply other threads:[~1988-11-21 22:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1988-11-21 22:42 larry [this message]
1988-11-22 1:27 ` Criticism of Ada Richard Pattis
1988-11-23 16:42 ` Richard Pettit
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox