* Of Empty Records
@ 1988-05-05 15:00 Black Adder
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Black Adder @ 1988-05-05 15:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
I have a problem when using empty records. Here is the sample type
declaration that I use:
type EMPTY_TYPE is
record
null;
end record;
now, I would like to declare a constant of that type, i.e.
EMPTY : constant EMPTY_TYPE := ??? ;
but it seems there is no way I could specify a value of type
EMPTY_TYPE. One solution would be to declare a variable of that type,
without any initial value. It does work on my compiler, behaves as a
constant, but I don't "like" it.
Is there another solution? did the language designers simply ignore
this problem?
Thanks,
Magnus Kempe
CS Dept.
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne
kempe@elma.epfl.ch (not always, avoid stormy days...)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~1988-05-05 15:00 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1988-05-05 15:00 Of Empty Records Black Adder
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox