From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Why is memory footprint smaller when compiled static?
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2002 23:03:34 +0200
Date: 2002-06-04T21:03:31+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87znyawyc9.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrnafpmag.47h.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no
Preben Randhol <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> writes:
> Why is there such a big difference?
Page granularity? Space taken by the GOT? Overhead of
position-independent code?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-06-04 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-06-04 15:14 Why is memory footprint smaller when compiled static? Preben Randhol
2002-06-04 16:13 ` Mark Johnson
2002-06-04 21:01 ` Florian Weimer
2002-06-04 21:02 ` Florian Weimer
2002-06-04 21:03 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2002-06-05 11:10 ` Preben Randhol
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2002-06-05 11:37 Grein, Christoph
2002-06-05 12:36 ` Preben Randhol
2002-06-05 13:42 ` Mark Johnson
2002-06-06 0:02 ` Steven Deller
2002-06-06 10:35 ` Preben Randhol
2002-06-06 14:26 ` Gautier
2002-06-06 15:08 ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
2002-06-06 15:24 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2002-06-06 19:35 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-06-10 23:51 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-06-11 0:53 ` Robert A Duff
2002-06-11 16:45 ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-11 17:08 ` Preben Randhol
2002-06-11 19:12 ` Wes Groleau
2002-06-11 21:38 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-06-11 21:32 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox