Re: Reducing the size of executables produced by GNAT

[Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>]

Maciej Sobczak writes:
> AWS is an excellent solution, but in practice requires full control
> on the given host. That does not work with the majority of hosting
> companies out there.

I was thinking along the same lines.  Maybe FastCGI might be an
option, but I doubt even that.

Reducing the size of the executables by a few kilobytes is not going
to make any difference, IMHO.  If the OP wants maximal performance in
forking processes on a shared host, maybe he should go all the way and
write his CGI scripts in assembly language :) does anyone else
perceive the irony in this?

To the OP: my advice is to get your own server (perhaps a virtual one)
and use AWS.

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.