From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Howto debug seg-faulting Ada 95 code?
Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2002 23:35:00 +0200
Date: 2002-09-02T21:34:55+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y9akulbv.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1f358d66.0209020705.6769d948@posting.google.com
karlran@hotmail.com (Karl Ran) writes:
> Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> wrote in message
>> Your code causes a stack overflow; "-fstack-check" should catch these
>> problems, but it doesn't. Looks like a bug to me.
>
> Is there a work-around for this software defect, other than using
> 'new'?
Which defect? The stack overflow? Well, you'd have to use an
architecture which offers 64 bit pointers. ("new" does not raise
Storage_Errore reliably either because physical memory is usually
allocated not as soon a logical memory region is allocated, but only
if the memory region is written to.)
I don't know any workarounds for the bug in "-fstack-check" which your
code triggers.
> Where can I find a list of known software defects of gnat 3.14p?
No such list is publicly available, I guess.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-09-02 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-08-31 7:58 Howto debug seg-faulting Ada 95 code? Karl Ran
2002-08-31 8:14 ` Florian Weimer
2002-09-02 15:05 ` Karl Ran
2002-09-02 16:25 ` Jeffrey Creem
2002-09-02 16:47 ` Pat Rogers
2002-09-02 22:40 ` Jeffrey Creem
2002-09-02 23:25 ` Pat Rogers
2002-09-03 11:20 ` Jeffrey Creem
2002-09-04 14:57 ` Pat Rogers
2002-09-03 8:51 ` Sergey Koshcheyev
2002-09-03 11:42 ` Samuel Tardieu
2002-09-07 18:50 ` Steven Deller
2002-09-02 21:35 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2002-09-03 9:11 ` Karl Ran
2002-09-03 2:27 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2002-09-03 9:38 ` Karl Ran
2002-09-03 12:15 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox