From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Operator visibility question
Date: 05 Jun 2001 00:12:35 +0200
Date: 2001-06-05T00:12:35+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87wv6revxo.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: M8OS6.3850$v4.184333@www.newsranger.com
Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com> writes:
> In article <87hexx34kt.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>, Florian Weimer says...
>>
>>If one argument of a comparison operator is a universal integer,
>>a universal real, a string, or an aggregate, then the visibility
>>check is not performed.
>
> Hmmm. That makes me wonder exactly which "<" the compiler is using when it
> generates the code?
The one which is not visible. ;-)
If there's no matching operator, I don't think the code in question is
reached at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-04 22:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-03 13:48 Operator visibility question Rod Chapman
2001-06-03 14:19 ` Jeff Creem
2001-06-03 15:47 ` Nacho Robledo
2001-06-03 20:15 ` Robert A Duff
2001-06-04 15:24 ` Rod Chapman
2001-06-04 17:55 ` Nacho Robledo
2001-06-04 21:27 ` Ted Dennison
2001-06-03 16:34 ` Florian Weimer
2001-06-04 15:52 ` Ted Dennison
2001-06-04 22:12 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2001-06-05 12:24 ` Rod Chapman
2001-06-03 20:13 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox