Re: Overloading attributes

[Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>]

anon@att.net writes:
> When a so called expert loses their cool and use bad language they lose 
> their creditability in any court or discussion. So there is no need for 
> anyone to lean a hand of aid or support.

OK, I'm not an expert witness at court, to it is OK for me to lose my
cool.  You have just made me lose my cool.  And I do not worry for my
credibility because I have *proven* that I can *deliver*.

> Plus, for those people who would speak in behalf, why would they speak
> here now and become targets for bulling by the others who do not agree
> with my speech.

Nobody here agrees with your speech.

> Of course most who were voicing their opinion were just upset because
> I was questioning the wisdom their Gods aka the ARG.

I do not think of the ARG members as Gods.  I think of them as
intelligent people.  People who actually think before they write ISO
standards.

> And the courts also do not favor those who just blindly follow a group
> like ARG without questioning the groups wisdom from time to time. Or a
> group that does not accept criticism from the outside.

Yet another falsehood.  The ARG does accept criticism, that's what AIs
are for.  Dmitry here regularly criticizes the design of Ada and nobody
objects to that because his criticisms are the result of actual
thinking.  In contrast, what you write is not criticism, it is bullshit.

> And especially those groups that do not accept and truly evaluate
> input from that their community.

I for one have truly evaluated your input and I have decided that your
input is garbage.

> If the ARG accepted input then it would be posted on a website for all
> to read and comment on that input. That way the ARG could judge the
> community desire for that request.

Newsflash for the ignorant: that is already the case and has been for
decades; see http://www.ada-auth.org.

> It also seams that you did not do your homework there are a few that
> support my posts in the newsgroup.

Name one.  I dare you.

> Some even tried to help in prior posts, when a guy was cutting me down
> for what I saying. Then about three to six month later wikileaks shows
> up and verified what I was saying.

Given your track record of unsubstantiated claims I will not even bother
looking that up to disprove you.  The burden of proof is on you.

> As a final word on this subject for now is

You do not have the final word, because you have not proven that you are
worthy of having the final word.

>                                            what you should of done was
> ask a question instead of cutting some one down.  That way it could be
> resolve in a tactful way that other could see that the ARG as a group
> listen to the Ada community and their concerns for the future of Ada.

You are not capable of answering technical questions.  Why should an
expert like JP ask a technical question?  Especially to you?  Please do
*not* answer.  Your posts are 99% bullshit and 1% actual knowledge of
Ada, which other people are better able than you are to convey.

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.
Our perspective generates the enabler.