From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: pragma Convention() Ada2012
Date: Sat, 21 Jul 2012 23:00:40 +0200
Date: 2012-07-21T23:00:40+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vchgu8w7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1olyz5p5952ya.i7joo9fs065h.dlg@40tude.net
* Dmitry A. Kazakov:
> On Sat, 21 Jul 2012 23:09:10 +0300, Niklas Holsti wrote:
>
>> The Convention aspect has the same effect as the Convention pragma, but
>> it has the advantage that the entity to which the aspect applies is
>> given by the position of the aspect specification, not by an identifier.
>
> On the other hand a pragma can be placed in the private part of the
> package, which looks more appropriate for an implementation-specific thing.
I don't think this is possible in general because the entity has
usually been frozen at that point.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-26 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-21 19:16 pragma Convention() Ada2012 wlan.etho0
2012-07-21 20:09 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-07-21 20:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-21 21:00 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2012-07-22 5:17 ` Shark8
2012-07-23 0:56 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-07-23 20:37 ` Florian Weimer
2012-07-21 20:29 ` wlan.etho0
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox