From: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>
Subject: Re: pragma Convention questions
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2007 08:55:51 +0100
Date: 2007-11-15T09:00:02+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87tzno2b94.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: fhgjug$e3m$1@jacob-sparre.dk
>>>>> "Randy" == Randy Brukardt <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:
Randy> I think in this case, you could never tell the difference, so
Randy> it would be OK to do. (One wonders why the Standard didn't
Randy> include that in the first place.)
Thank you. It is now fixed in GCC sources.
>> GNAT rejects X initialization with 'prefix of "Access" attribute
>> cannot be intrinsic'. Which means that the pragma Convention failed
>> silently. Is it allowed to have it fail without a compilation
>> error? Or is the 'Access legal?
Randy> I think that it should either work or the pragma Convention
Randy> should be rejected. To allow the change of the convention to
Randy> one that is legal and still reject the 'Access is bogus. (OTOH,
Randy> this doesn't seem like a very important bug, and I would not be
Randy> surprised if it took a long time to get fixed.)
This is free software after all: I added a fix yesterday into the GCC
source tree :)
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-11-15 7:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-11-11 16:39 pragma Convention questions Samuel Tardieu
2007-11-11 19:14 ` Martin Krischik
2007-11-11 20:57 ` Samuel Tardieu
2007-11-12 8:14 ` Martin Krischik
2007-11-12 8:30 ` Samuel Tardieu
2007-11-12 17:02 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-11-12 21:54 ` Samuel Tardieu
2007-11-15 5:06 ` Randy Brukardt
2007-11-15 7:55 ` Samuel Tardieu [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox