From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: GNAT runtime licensing mess
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2015 18:59:17 +0100
Date: 2015-02-24T18:59:17+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sidv6vii.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 0414d9e6-9303-4c91-9cb2-313427c1193b@googlegroups.com
* Patrick Noffke:
> This got me thinking -- who are AdaCore to choose whether or not to
> include this clause?
This is explicitly permitted under the terms of the GNU General Public
License, version 3, in section 7: “When you convey a copy of a covered
work, you may at your option remove any additional permissions from
that copy, or from any part of it.” (The GCC run-time library
exception uses the additional permissions framework established by the
GPL.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-24 17:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-24 15:49 GNAT runtime licensing mess Patrick Noffke
2015-02-24 17:59 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2015-02-24 19:43 ` David Botton
2015-02-24 20:30 ` Simon Wright
2015-02-24 22:03 ` David Botton
2015-02-25 17:46 ` Simon Wright
2015-02-25 14:07 ` Patrick Noffke
2015-02-27 19:59 ` Waldek Hebisch
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox