From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Why not Coq2Ada program extraction?
Date: Sun, 06 May 2018 21:20:22 -0700
Date: 2018-05-06T21:20:22-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sh74umex.fsf@nightsong.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 685bfd38-3a46-46a6-979f-39157e025690@googlegroups.com
"Dan'l Miller" <optikos@verizon.net> writes:
> Here is an intro to the somewhat analogous codegen from HOL4:
> https://isabelle.in.tum.de/doc/codegen.pdf
Thanks, that is interesting. I've heard of Isabelle/HOL being used for
verification in connection with Ada, but hadn't looked at it closely and
thought it worked somewhat differently.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-07 4:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-01 3:38 Why not Coq2Ada program extraction? Dan'l Miller
2018-05-01 3:59 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-01 6:59 ` Chris M Moore
2018-05-01 7:41 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-01 11:44 ` Jere
2018-05-02 16:47 ` G.B.
2018-05-02 17:12 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-01 8:21 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2018-05-01 17:30 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-05-01 9:12 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-07 2:30 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-05-07 2:37 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-07 3:50 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-05-07 4:01 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-05-07 4:20 ` Paul Rubin [this message]
2018-05-07 16:33 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-05-07 13:27 ` Dan'l Miller
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox