From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: FYI: GNAT and GCC
Date: Thu, 04 Oct 2001 14:46:25 +0200
Date: 2001-10-04T14:46:25+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ofnnvahq.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5ee5b646.0110040338.4ebe6529@posting.google.com
dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes:
> I just don't want people to get the wrong impression here.
> I think a fair analogy is the extent to which chill got
> picked up as part of typical gcc installs.
With the same prospect for the future? I hope not. ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-04 12:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-02 13:40 FYI: GNAT and GCC Florian Weimer
2001-10-02 14:14 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-10-02 18:22 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-03 4:04 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-02 19:24 ` mike
2001-10-02 20:10 ` 3-13p or 3-14a1 Frank
2001-10-02 21:10 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-10-02 21:26 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-03 4:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-03 7:00 ` Frank
2001-10-03 4:42 ` FYI: GNAT and GCC Ian S. Nelson
2001-10-03 16:12 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-03 20:52 ` Preben Randhol
2001-10-04 11:38 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-04 12:46 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2001-10-04 2:53 ` Ian S. Nelson
2001-10-05 13:42 ` Dale Pontius
2001-10-08 15:19 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
2001-10-09 17:30 ` Robert Dewar
2001-10-09 18:48 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox