From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Allocators for anonymous access return types
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:18:02 +0100
Date: 2010-10-31T13:18:02+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ocaa1rph.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
It seems that an allocator for an anonymous accesss return type of a
library-level function essentially leaks memory (unless you use
garbage collection, of course). Is this really the case? I would
expect such objects to be deallocated by the master for the expression
where the return type occurs.
next reply other threads:[~2010-10-31 12:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-31 12:18 Florian Weimer [this message]
2010-10-31 12:46 ` Allocators for anonymous access return types J-P. Rosen
2010-10-31 13:23 ` Florian Weimer
2010-10-31 14:10 ` J-P. Rosen
2010-10-31 14:28 ` Florian Weimer
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox