From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Forking old GMGPL libs ?
Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 09:10:10 +0200
Date: 2012-10-06T09:10:10+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87obkg5b59.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5de9a47c-6594-4653-a083-38f90312e70e@googlegroups.com
> This is total crack smok'in, I hardly know anything about the clang
> compiler and don't have the time of intelligence to fork GNAT but
> does anyone think it would be technically possible to retool GNAT's
> to output clang's AST.
Clang's AST is very specific to the C family of languages. You'd have
to generate LLVM directly.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-10-11 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-05 22:51 Forking old GMGPL libs ? Patrick
2012-10-05 23:52 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-10-06 3:28 ` Patrick
2012-10-06 9:11 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-10-06 4:52 ` Stephen Leake
2012-10-06 7:10 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2012-10-06 8:10 ` Simon Wright
2012-10-06 9:45 ` Brian Drummond
2012-10-06 11:27 ` LLVM and GCC (was: Forking old GMGPL libs ?) Ludovic Brenta
2012-10-06 14:04 ` Patrick
2012-10-06 15:11 ` Brian Drummond
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox