From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Questions about Ada Core Technologies
Date: 07 Apr 2004 17:27:47 +0200
Date: 2004-04-07T17:27:47+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87n05nreoc.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87oeq4vkod.fsf@insalien.org
Ludovic Brenta <ludovic.brenta@insalien.org> writes:
> - Have ACT really switched their day-to-day development to the FSF?
> The changelogs suggest so, in which case I can suppose they merge
> selected changes to GNAT Pro in their private repository?
The main development happens on ACT's infrastructure (after all, they
have a far more extensive test suite (which is partly covered by NDAs
and cannot be published), an automated regression tester based on that
test suite, a separate bug tracking system, their own developer
communication channels &c).
Arnaud Charlet regularly (daily?) merges ACT's changes into the FSF
tree. But this doesn't mean that this tree is the sole reference for
development.
--
Current mail filters: many dial-up/DSL/cable modem hosts, and the
following domains: postino.it, tiscali.co.uk, tiscali.cz, tiscali.it,
voila.fr.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-04-07 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-04-06 21:52 Questions about Ada Core Technologies Ludovic Brenta
2004-04-07 3:22 ` Stephen Leake
2004-04-08 0:33 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2004-04-08 2:37 ` Stephen Leake
2004-04-13 20:54 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-04-14 8:57 ` Peter Hermann
2004-04-14 13:56 ` Robert I. Eachus
2004-04-07 4:38 ` Steve
2004-04-07 15:27 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox