From: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>
Subject: Re: Poll: Qt4Ada as alternative to GtkAda
Date: 28 Jul 2006 17:56:27 +0200
Date: 2006-07-28T18:00:40+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mzatyb84.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: saipp3-rok.ln1@newserver.thecreems.com
>>>>> "Jeffrey" == Jeffrey Creem <jeff@thecreems.com> writes:
Jeffrey> Of course, the FSF could make a change like that. While
Jeffrey> AdaCore's actions are (hopefully) driven by profit motives,
Jeffrey> FSF's motives are simply trying to ensure an end state where
Jeffrey> software is "Free" (in a GPL sense). So they could certainly
Jeffrey> change future releases to pure GPL for their own reasons
Exactly. But I would not understand if they did that for the GNAT
library and not for the C++ STL. Why restrict the use of the GNU Ada
compiler when the use of the GNU C++ compiler isn't?
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-28 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-27 23:08 Poll: Qt4Ada as alternative to GtkAda Yves Bailly
2006-07-28 7:02 ` vgodunko
2006-07-28 7:36 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-07-28 10:09 ` Preben Randhol
2006-07-28 10:24 ` michael bode
2006-07-28 10:34 ` Preben Randhol
2006-07-28 13:17 ` Simon Clubley
2006-07-28 14:08 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-07-28 15:56 ` Samuel Tardieu [this message]
2006-07-28 17:47 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-29 19:10 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-07-30 14:53 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-28 16:45 ` Martin Krischik
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox