* Re: Newbie question: Testing a generic package
[not found] <1123432298.685525.281490@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
@ 2005-08-07 17:20 ` Ludovic Brenta
2005-08-07 21:27 ` tmoran
1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Brenta @ 2005-08-07 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw)
"strictly_mk@hotmail.com" <strictly_mk@hotmail.com> writes:
> Some of you have guided me to finish this code I was working on which
> finaly compiles. What I want to know is, how do I test it? Since it is
> a generic package, how do I get the procedures to work so I can test
> them?
> I'm not to concerned if they actually work or not, i just need to show
> that it has been tested. Any suggestions?
You need to create an instance of the generic package, and then call
the subprograms from the instance.
> --specification
> generic
> type ID is (<>);
> package PoP is
[...]
> end PoP;
with Pop;
procedure Test_Driver is
type Person_ID is range 1 .. 1_000_000;
package Instance_Of_Pop is new Pop (ID => Person_ID);
begin
Instance_Of_Pop.Reset;
...
end Test_Driver;
--
Ludovic Brenta.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Newbie question: Testing a generic package
[not found] <1123432298.685525.281490@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
2005-08-07 17:20 ` Newbie question: Testing a generic package Ludovic Brenta
@ 2005-08-07 21:27 ` tmoran
2005-08-08 5:32 ` Ludovic Brenta
1 sibling, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: tmoran @ 2005-08-07 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
>I'm not to concerned if they actually work or not, i just need to show
>that it has been tested.
Interesting concept. I trust you swear never to work on anything
anybody might depend on?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Newbie question: Testing a generic package
2005-08-07 21:27 ` tmoran
@ 2005-08-08 5:32 ` Ludovic Brenta
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Ludovic Brenta @ 2005-08-08 5:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
tmoran@acm.org writes:
>>I'm not to concerned if they actually work or not, i just need to show
>>that it has been tested.
> Interesting concept. I trust you swear never to work on anything
> anybody might depend on?
Interesting wording :)
To the OP: I trust you understand I cannot trust you? :)
--
Ludovic Brenta.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-08 5:32 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <1123432298.685525.281490@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
2005-08-07 17:20 ` Newbie question: Testing a generic package Ludovic Brenta
2005-08-07 21:27 ` tmoran
2005-08-08 5:32 ` Ludovic Brenta
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox