From: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>
Subject: Re: Elaboration worries
Date: 21 Jun 2006 20:01:25 +0200
Date: 2006-06-21T20:04:43+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87lkrqfkwa.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4fssh9F1ena5jU1@individual.net
>>>>> "Alex" == Alex R Mosteo <devnull@mailinator.com> writes:
Alex> The first one is that I don't really grasp why a "Elaborate_All"
Alex> could be needed if one strictly follows the tree rules above.
Do you mean, you have at least a pragma Elaborate_Body in all your
packages?
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-21 18:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-21 12:33 Elaboration worries Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-21 18:01 ` Samuel Tardieu [this message]
2006-06-21 20:34 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-06-21 23:07 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-06-22 23:06 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-06-23 18:42 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-06-23 19:54 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-06-21 23:12 ` Robert A Duff
2006-06-22 23:09 ` Randy Brukardt
2006-06-21 23:07 ` Robert A Duff
2006-06-22 2:24 ` Matthew Heaney
2006-06-22 10:36 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-22 16:25 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-06-22 23:31 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox