* X'Alignment and System.Address without a "mod" operator?
@ 2015-01-05 14:49 Jacob Sparre Andersen
2015-01-05 16:47 ` Jeffrey Carter
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen @ 2015-01-05 14:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
RM 13.3(23/2) says:
The value of this attribute is of type universal_integer, and
nonnegative; zero means that the object is not necessarily aligned on
a storage element boundary. If X'Alignment is not zero, then X is
aligned on a storage unit boundary and X'Address is an integral
multiple of X'Alignment (that is, the Address modulo the Alignment is
zero).
But when I look for a suitable function to check the requirement in the
final parenthesis in package System (RM 13.7) - something like:
function "mod" (Left : Address; Right : some_integer_type)
return some_integer_type;
it isn't there. That makes it kind of hard to implement storage pools
for types with alignment requirements.
I suppose I should report the problem to Ada-Comment, but I would prefer
that somebody could tell me that I have overlooked something.
Greetings,
Jacob
--
"If I have to choose between two evils, I choose the one I
haven't tried before."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: X'Alignment and System.Address without a "mod" operator?
2015-01-05 14:49 X'Alignment and System.Address without a "mod" operator? Jacob Sparre Andersen
@ 2015-01-05 16:47 ` Jeffrey Carter
2015-01-05 20:07 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jeffrey Carter @ 2015-01-05 16:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
On 01/05/2015 07:49 AM, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote:
>
> function "mod" (Left : Address; Right : some_integer_type)
> return some_integer_type;
System.Storage_Elements (ARM 13.7.1) has
8/3
function "mod"(Left : Address; Right : Storage_Offset)
return Storage_Offset
with Convention => Intrinsic;
http://www.adaic.org/resources/add_content/standards/12rm/html/RM-13-7-1.html
--
Jeff Carter
"Blessed is just about anyone with a vested interest in the status quo."
Monty Python's Life of Brian
73
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: X'Alignment and System.Address without a "mod" operator?
2015-01-05 16:47 ` Jeffrey Carter
@ 2015-01-05 20:07 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen @ 2015-01-05 20:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
Jeffrey Carter wrote:
> System.Storage_Elements (ARM 13.7.1) has
>
> 8/3
> function "mod"(Left : Address; Right : Storage_Offset)
> return Storage_Offset
> with Convention => Intrinsic;
Thanks!
I wonder why I didn't think of looking there.
Jacob
--
"There is nothing worse than having only one drunk head."
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-01-05 20:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-01-05 14:49 X'Alignment and System.Address without a "mod" operator? Jacob Sparre Andersen
2015-01-05 16:47 ` Jeffrey Carter
2015-01-05 20:07 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox