From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Gibberish posts
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 23:37:50 +0200
Date: 2001-07-31T23:37:50+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87itg893v5.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: g$+T0Yn6iuDR@eisner.encompasserve.org
Kilgallen@eisner.decus.org.nospam (Larry Kilgallen) writes:
> Are you saying the Complaints header was forged as well ?
You should use the X-Complaints-To: header only if you know the
posting was injected at a well-maintained server (so the header is
quite pointless), and Hipcrime attacks usually don't involve such
servers, I think. However, in the past, path exclusions worked quite
well against Hipcrime, and going after the upstream provider or the
peers was sometimes successful, too.
(However, I've seen Hipcrime only in de.*, and it might be somewhat
different in the Big8, who knows.)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-07-31 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-07-29 15:51 It's very root today, I'll annoy tamely or Owen will dump the iterations John Levitz
2001-07-30 14:17 ` Chris M. Moore
2001-07-31 19:22 ` Gibberish posts Karen Lofstrom
2001-07-31 20:42 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-07-31 21:37 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox