From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Subject: Re: Is it Ada 2005 or Ada 2007?
Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 13:02:21 +0100
Date: 2007-10-31T13:02:21+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ir4nv6eq.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: uwst31ptw.fsf@stephe-leake.org
Stephen Leake <stephen_leake@stephe-leake.org> writes:
> Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org> writes:
>> Officially informally (!), it is "Ada 2005" because ARM 3.1/2 says so.
>> That is the result of a majority agreement between the members of the
>> working group, most of whom are compiler vendors.
>
> Just being pedantic, I don't see that statement in ARM 3.1/2; that
> paragraph doesn't exist; see
> http://www.adaic.org/standards/05rm/html/RM-3-1.html
>
> Perhaps you meant a different paragraph?
Yes, I meant paragraph 3.1/2 in the Introduction, not paragraph 2 in
section 3.1. See http://www.adaic.org/standards/05rm/html/RM-0-3.html
--
Ludovic Brenta.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-10-31 12:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-10-30 22:16 Is it Ada 2005 or Ada 2007? Jerry
2007-10-30 23:49 ` Ludovic Brenta
2007-10-31 11:33 ` Stephen Leake
2007-10-31 12:02 ` Ludovic Brenta [this message]
2007-11-01 11:16 ` Stephen Leake
2007-11-01 22:34 ` Adam Beneschan
2007-11-11 0:51 ` Brian Gaffney
2007-10-31 0:05 ` anon
2007-10-31 15:38 ` Georg Bauhaus
2007-11-01 9:26 ` Jerry
2007-11-04 12:07 ` Dirk Craeynest
2007-11-04 12:32 ` Markus E L
2007-11-04 21:55 ` Jerry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox