* Re: Newbie question: Testing a generic package [not found] <1123432298.685525.281490@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> @ 2005-08-07 17:20 ` Ludovic Brenta 2005-08-07 21:27 ` tmoran 1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Brenta @ 2005-08-07 17:20 UTC (permalink / raw) "strictly_mk@hotmail.com" <strictly_mk@hotmail.com> writes: > Some of you have guided me to finish this code I was working on which > finaly compiles. What I want to know is, how do I test it? Since it is > a generic package, how do I get the procedures to work so I can test > them? > I'm not to concerned if they actually work or not, i just need to show > that it has been tested. Any suggestions? You need to create an instance of the generic package, and then call the subprograms from the instance. > --specification > generic > type ID is (<>); > package PoP is [...] > end PoP; with Pop; procedure Test_Driver is type Person_ID is range 1 .. 1_000_000; package Instance_Of_Pop is new Pop (ID => Person_ID); begin Instance_Of_Pop.Reset; ... end Test_Driver; -- Ludovic Brenta. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Newbie question: Testing a generic package [not found] <1123432298.685525.281490@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> 2005-08-07 17:20 ` Newbie question: Testing a generic package Ludovic Brenta @ 2005-08-07 21:27 ` tmoran 2005-08-08 5:32 ` Ludovic Brenta 1 sibling, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: tmoran @ 2005-08-07 21:27 UTC (permalink / raw) >I'm not to concerned if they actually work or not, i just need to show >that it has been tested. Interesting concept. I trust you swear never to work on anything anybody might depend on? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* Re: Newbie question: Testing a generic package 2005-08-07 21:27 ` tmoran @ 2005-08-08 5:32 ` Ludovic Brenta 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Ludovic Brenta @ 2005-08-08 5:32 UTC (permalink / raw) tmoran@acm.org writes: >>I'm not to concerned if they actually work or not, i just need to show >>that it has been tested. > Interesting concept. I trust you swear never to work on anything > anybody might depend on? Interesting wording :) To the OP: I trust you understand I cannot trust you? :) -- Ludovic Brenta. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-08-08 5:32 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- [not found] <1123432298.685525.281490@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> 2005-08-07 17:20 ` Newbie question: Testing a generic package Ludovic Brenta 2005-08-07 21:27 ` tmoran 2005-08-08 5:32 ` Ludovic Brenta
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox