From: Matthew Woodcraft <mattheww@chiark.greenend.org.uk>
Subject: Re: Interest in sockets package development
Date: 10 Sep 2001 20:11:20 +0100
Date: 2001-09-10T20:11:20+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87g09u3lpj.fsf@chiark.greenend.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: nX3n7.2191$%u4.2297@www.newsranger.com
Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com> writes:
> Bindings should *not* use the LGPL. That license was designed for link
> libraries, not compiled-in source code. In some ways it is actually *more*
> restrictive than the GPL in this environment.
The LGPL explicitly allows you to treat LGPL-licensed software as
GPLed instead (as a one-time conversion), so it can never really be
more restrictive than the GPL.
-M-
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-10 19:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-09 3:47 Interest in sockets package development Chad R. Meiners
2001-09-09 4:48 ` David Botton
2001-09-09 13:41 ` Florian Weimer
2001-09-10 14:21 ` Marin David Condic
[not found] ` <002901c138ea$bb6d26c0$0100a8c0@DBINSPIRON>
2001-09-09 11:59 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
[not found] ` <05a601c13926$e6f34e50$1600000a@dhoossr>
2001-09-09 14:48 ` David Botton
2001-09-09 18:29 ` Simon Wright
2001-09-09 19:52 ` tmoran
2001-09-10 1:14 ` Chad R. Meiners
2001-09-10 4:28 ` tmoran
2001-09-10 7:41 ` Tony Gair
2001-09-10 7:59 ` Tony Gair
2001-09-10 14:16 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-10 19:11 ` Matthew Woodcraft [this message]
2001-09-10 21:43 ` Chad R. Meiners
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox