From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: meaningfully/compellingly "advertising" Ada on StackOverflow
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 18:22:16 -0700
Date: 2018-05-17T18:22:16-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fu2psqpj.fsf@nightsong.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1559505943.548291689.457576.laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org
Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com> writes:
> The aim is to see how languages stack up. By using the standard
> containers with their anti-tampering and other checks, you would be
> hobbling Ada in this case.
Ummph, the anti-tampering and other checks are part of Ada's safety
which is its main compelling feature. If you turn them off then Ada no
longer brings any benefit compared with unsafe languages.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-18 1:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-16 14:27 meaningfully/compellingly “advertising” Ada on StackOverflow Dan'l Miller
2018-05-16 14:35 ` Lucretia
2018-05-16 15:06 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-05-16 22:48 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-17 2:46 ` John Perry
2018-05-17 2:49 ` John Perry
2018-05-17 21:25 ` meaningfully/compellingly "advertising" " Randy Brukardt
2018-05-17 23:27 ` Luke A. Guest
2018-05-18 1:22 ` Paul Rubin [this message]
2018-05-18 2:28 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-05-18 2:59 ` Lucretia
2018-05-18 2:57 ` Lucretia
2018-05-18 4:25 ` John Perry
2018-05-18 4:38 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-18 15:39 ` John Perry
2018-05-18 15:48 ` John Perry
2018-05-18 20:49 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-18 20:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-18 4:37 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-18 10:44 ` Lucretia
2018-05-20 7:54 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-18 11:17 ` Ben Bacarisse
2018-05-18 20:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-18 4:22 ` John Perry
2018-05-18 20:52 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-05-18 11:10 ` Simon Wright
2018-05-18 15:43 ` meaningfully/compellingly “advertising” " John Perry
2018-05-18 16:40 ` Dan'l Miller
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox