From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Subject: Re: Should exceeding the range of Integer wrap around a la C?
Date: Mon, 21 May 2018 18:36:20 -0700
Date: 2018-05-21T18:36:20-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fu2kmpyj.fsf@nightsong.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8d534f74-efa1-42ab-aa8a-2826b4cd6cc9@googlegroups.com
Jere <jhb.chat@gmail.com> writes:
> Just wanted to point this out because I think you have a typo, but
> overflow for unsigned integers is completely defined in the C standard.
Sorry yes of course you're right, it was a typo, I meant to say signed.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-22 1:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-21 15:23 Should exceeding the range of Integer wrap around a la C? nrs5134
2018-05-21 15:27 ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2018-05-21 15:45 ` Anh Vo
2018-05-21 16:46 ` Simon Wright
2018-05-21 18:47 ` Anh Vo
2018-05-21 15:57 ` Lucretia
2018-05-21 16:49 ` Simon Wright
2018-05-21 19:11 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-22 0:39 ` Jere
2018-05-22 0:58 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-05-22 1:36 ` Paul Rubin [this message]
2018-05-21 20:43 ` nrs5134
2018-05-22 17:52 ` Björn Lundin
2018-05-22 20:11 ` nrs5134
2018-05-22 20:23 ` Björn Lundin
2018-05-23 7:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox