From: Anh Vo <anhvofrcaus@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: bug in gnatgpl 2015?
Date: Mon, 31 Aug 2015 08:54:58 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2015-08-31T08:54:58-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87fd523d-03ac-4500-94be-f6220d9d16e8@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <MPG.304dfbae392e2645989682@text.giganews.com>
On Monday, August 31, 2015 at 3:51:20 AM UTC-7, Peter Chapin wrote:
> In article <0e9794c2-8702-42bd-96db-978d87a97bf2@googlegroups.com>,
> leo.brewin@internode.on.net says...
>
>> I think the code in my example is legal so the compiler shouldn't
>> crash.
>
> It doesn't matter if the code is legal or not. The compiler should never
> crash.
A bug report should be in order.
Anh Vo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-08-31 15:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-31 7:34 bug in gnatgpl 2015? Leo Brewin
2015-08-31 8:48 ` Simon Wright
2015-08-31 9:19 ` Leo Brewin
2015-08-31 10:51 ` Peter Chapin
2015-08-31 15:54 ` Anh Vo [this message]
2015-08-31 23:33 ` Anh Vo
2015-08-31 23:37 ` Leo Brewin
2015-08-31 23:55 ` Leo Brewin
2015-08-31 23:35 ` Leo Brewin
2015-09-01 0:33 ` Leo Brewin
2015-09-01 1:24 ` Anh Vo
2015-09-01 12:42 ` Simon Wright
2015-09-01 7:44 ` Markus Schöpflin
2015-09-01 9:17 ` G.B.
2015-09-01 13:43 ` ahlan
2015-09-01 13:45 ` ahlan
2015-09-10 7:31 ` Jerry van Dijk
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox