From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Subject: Re: Ada.Containers.Vectors Update_Element issue
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 10:13:54 +0200
Date: 2008-05-17T10:13:54+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87d4nluz3x.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 482AFEAC.3040306@gmail.com
Sébastien <seb.morand@gmail.com> writes:
> There was no procedure access in previous ada version?
There was no *anonymous* access-to-procedure types in Ada 95; only
named access types like:
type Access_To_Procedure is access procedure (A, B : Integer);
And named access types are subject to "accessibility rules" (ARM
3.10.2, in particular clause 32) whereas anonymous access types are
not (and are subject to run-time checks instead).
--
Ludovic Brenta.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-05-17 8:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-05-13 17:26 Ada.Containers.Vectors Update_Element issue Sébastien
2008-05-13 17:55 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-05-14 15:01 ` Sébastien
2008-05-14 15:17 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-05-14 18:21 ` Sébastien
2008-05-14 21:25 ` Matthew Heaney
2008-05-14 21:33 ` Adam Beneschan
2008-05-17 8:13 ` Ludovic Brenta [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox