From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Ada and JVM? Why not AdaVM?
Date: 28 Jan 2001 09:44:27 +0100
Date: 2001-01-28T09:44:27+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ae8crrpw.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 94vdt9$a2g1@news.cis.okstate.edu
dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu (David Starner) writes:
> * AVM doesn't run on anything yet;
You could target one of the existing VMs. For example, you could
create a GNAT backend for the Guile, Python, or Emacs virtual machine.
Some day, if I have plenty of time, I plan to retarget JGNAT to one of
these platforms. It's certainly a lot of useless fun. ;-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-28 8:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-27 16:47 Ada and JVM? Why not AdaVM? chris.danx
2001-01-27 21:17 ` David Starner
2001-01-28 8:44 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2001-01-29 23:40 ` Ronald Cole
2001-01-30 1:27 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-30 8:28 ` Florian Weimer
2001-01-30 19:29 ` Ada and JVM? Why not AdaVM? ms .net vm Singlespeeder
2001-02-01 0:01 ` Ada and JVM? Why not AdaVM? Ronald Cole
2001-02-01 7:32 ` Florian Weimer
2001-02-02 17:33 ` Ray Blaak
2001-02-01 11:57 ` Tarjei T. Jensen
2001-02-01 17:35 ` Ray Blaak
2001-02-01 16:19 ` joswig
2001-01-30 21:12 ` Nick Roberts
2001-02-02 0:19 ` Larry J. Elmore
2001-02-02 3:41 ` Robert Dewar
2001-02-03 3:49 ` Larry J. Elmore
2001-02-05 19:46 ` Tucker Taft
2001-02-05 20:31 ` Ted Dennison
2001-02-05 20:58 ` Pat Rogers
2001-01-27 22:31 ` gdemont
2001-01-30 2:41 ` Julian Morrison
2001-01-30 7:08 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-01-30 12:55 ` John English
2001-01-31 21:05 ` chris.danx
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox