Re: Indefinite Containers of Indefinite Private Types

[Bob Duff <bobduff@theworld.com>]

"Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org> writes:

> Yes, of course. The examples are simplified from a more complex case where the
> container is used in the full type definition. This can be achieved by adding
> some additional code that is essentially noise, or by using access types.
> Avoiding access types is worth adding noise, but it would be nice if the noise
> were unnecessary.

I'm curious what the "noise" looks like in your case.

Last time I ran into this problem I think I ended up using a workaround
that involved access types.  I don't remember the details.

- Bob