From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.15 - GCC 3.x
Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2002 14:13:11 +0100
Date: 2002-11-17T13:13:12+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878yzsbaqg.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrnatf34h.5c0.adi@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de
Adrian Knoth <adi@drcomp.erfurt.thur.de> writes:
> What about the common way of using a subset-language-stage0-compiler
> written in shellscript or C?
This is still a very significant amount of work. Such work would be
spent better designing an efficient (register-based?) VM and GCC
backend for it.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-17 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-14 17:51 GNAT 3.15 - GCC 3.x (Was Re: Format of .adp file) sk
2002-11-14 20:21 ` Simon Wright
2002-11-14 23:09 ` sk
2002-11-15 11:16 ` chris.danx
2002-11-15 16:27 ` sk
2002-11-15 17:41 ` Stephen Leake
2002-11-15 19:11 ` chris.danx
2002-11-16 21:41 ` Stephen Leake
2002-11-17 12:33 ` Adrian Knoth
2002-11-17 13:13 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2002-11-17 18:41 ` Pascal Obry
2002-11-17 23:11 ` Porting the GNAT runtime (was: Re: GNAT 3.15 - GCC 3.x) SteveD
2002-11-18 3:25 ` sk
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox