From: Florian Weimer <Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE>
Subject: Re: Help-memory allocation
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:17:56 +0200
Date: 2003-07-01T11:17:56+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <878yriobaz.fsf@Login.CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: d40d7104.0307010106.667222e4@posting.google.com
vashwath@rediffmail.com (prashna) writes:
> Don't you think "commit on allocate" is better choice?
At least on UNIX systems with a few typical UNIX services, the
situations in which the system continues to run in commit-on-use mode
is a proper subset of the situations for commit-on-allocate mode. So
commit-on-use is the better choice.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-01 9:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-06-30 9:11 Help-memory allocation prashna
2003-06-30 9:14 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2003-06-30 10:30 ` Rodrigo Garcia
2003-06-30 14:56 ` Florian Weimer
2003-06-30 15:25 ` Vinzent Hoefler
2003-06-30 16:56 `
2003-07-01 9:15 ` Florian Weimer
2003-07-01 8:58 ` Florian Weimer
2003-07-03 6:53 ` prashna
2003-07-03 7:24 ` Robert I. Eachus
2003-07-01 9:06 ` prashna
2003-07-01 9:17 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2003-07-01 12:21 `
2003-07-02 15:59 ` Richard Riehle
2003-07-02 22:35 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox