From: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>
Subject: Re: Two class-wide operands, but only one controlling
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2002 09:59:02 +0100
Date: 2002-11-24T09:59:02+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877kf34a3t.fsf@inf.enst.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3de08dce$0$301$bed64819@news.gradwell.net
>>>>> "Victor" == Victor Porton <porton@ex-code.com> writes:
Victor> In article <ubs4gvzea.fsf@wanadoo.fr>,
Victor> Pascal Obry <p.obry@wanadoo.fr> writes:
>> porton@ex-code.com (Victor Porton) writes:
>>
>>> I want something like a procedure with two class-wide operands,
>>> (of two different types) but only one of these controlling.
>>>
>>> The solution I found is introducing new tagged record types which
>>> would refer to these two types and passing both operands as one
>>> operand in such the record. Other solutions?
>>
>> Declare the second one as a class-wide ('Class) parameter.
Victor> What?! It is clearly stated that I want _both_ of them class
Victor> wide...
I think you are confusing actual (in the call) and formal (in the
declaration) parameters. Pascal proposes that you use a first
non-class-wide formal parameter and a second class-wide formal
parameter.
The actual parameter of a class-wide formal parameter cannot be a
controlling operand.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/sam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-24 8:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-23 16:10 Two class-wide operands, but only one controlling Victor Porton
2002-11-23 19:50 ` Pascal Obry
2002-11-24 8:27 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-24 8:59 ` Samuel Tardieu [this message]
2002-11-24 11:34 ` Victor Porton
2002-11-24 21:56 ` Pascal Obry
2002-11-25 22:17 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-11-27 17:25 ` Matthew Heaney
2002-11-25 19:19 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox