From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT?
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 12:12:50 +0200
Date: 2001-09-23T12:12:50+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <8766aajjvh.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 5ee5b646.0109221629.62a32528@posting.google.com
dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes:
> This will be the last release in that form. After that,
> the GNAT sources will be part of the GCC 3.x release, and
> various people will build public releases from these
> sources, as happens for GNU C today.
Are there any ideas how to ensure binary compatibility across GNAT
builds from different distributors of the same operating system?
(I've got a draft of a GNU Ada Environment Specification in the attic,
but someone with intimate knowledge of the GNAT technology would have
to proofread it at this point.)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-09-23 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-09-22 15:52 Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT? DuckE
2001-09-23 0:29 ` Robert Dewar
2001-09-23 10:12 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2001-09-24 13:54 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-27 15:32 ` Florian Weimer
2001-09-28 13:38 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-29 20:38 ` Florian Weimer
2001-09-23 15:20 ` Dave Parsons
2001-09-24 13:59 ` Ted Dennison
2001-09-30 16:00 ` Robert Dewar
2001-09-25 4:00 ` Robert Dewar
2001-09-25 6:12 ` Source of 3.13p binary for OS/2. (Was: Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT?) Dave Parsons
2001-09-30 15:58 ` Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT? Robert Dewar
2002-03-02 10:24 ` 3.14p Binary for OS/2. Was: " Dave Parsons
2002-03-02 17:00 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-03 7:11 ` Dave Parsons
2002-03-03 13:54 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-04 10:41 ` Robert Dewar
2002-03-05 6:10 ` Dave Parsons
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox