From: Chris Morgan <mihalis@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Two dimensional arrays: help
Date: 1998/01/06
Date: 1998-01-06T10:57:17-06:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874t3hnwv4.fsf@ix.netcom.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: dewar.884014602@merv
dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar) writes:
> I know of no "loss of efficiency introduced into unsigned
> numbers between the rationale and the manual", you should elaborate.
> Certainly the rules in the manual are quite clear, and I see no basis
> at all for the claim that it is impossible to know the rules about
> unsigned numbers without examples.
I for one clearly remember Michael complaining that the modular types
in Ada95 don't behave the way the Rationale implied and you responding
that the Rationale is wrong.
Perhaps we can all agree that the most useless material for learning
from possible is wrong examples!
Chris
--
Chris Morgan <mihalis at ix.netcom.com>
"I'm considering throwing myself out of the window. It
wouldn't do me much damage because we're on the ground
floor, but it might make for a bit of variety." - Lizzy Bryant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-01-06 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-01-05 0:00 About a C/C++ to ADA translator Marcos Jimenez Bermejo
1998-01-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-01-05 0:00 ` Two dimensional arrays: help Michael F Brenner
1998-01-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-01-06 0:00 ` Chris Morgan [this message]
1998-01-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-01-05 0:00 ` About a C/C++ to ADA translator Marcos Jimenez Bermejo
1998-01-05 0:00 ` Kenneth W. Sodemann
1998-01-05 0:00 ` nabbasi
1998-01-05 0:00 ` David Weller
1998-01-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-01-07 0:00 ` Benoit Jauvin-Girard
1998-01-12 0:00 ` Jean-Claude MAHIEUX
1998-01-09 0:00 ` Brian G. Holmes
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox