From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: epoll Ada binding
Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2004 23:35:59 +0200
Date: 2004-10-19T23:35:59+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874qkqtmps.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m38ya37pyf.fsf@0x5358c0d0.boanxx18.adsl-dhcp.tele.dk
* Mark Lorenzen:
> I think you have to write your own. But do you really need epoll? It
> is not POSIX compatable and only necessary when you have many (over
> 10000) concurrent connections.
epoll shows its effect far below the 10,000 concurrent connection
level. It also allows for programming styles that are difficult to
replicate with other I/O multiplexing system calls. For example, the
leader/followers pattern is in this category (IIRC).
prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-10-19 21:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-10-18 19:00 epoll Ada binding jn
2004-10-18 20:04 ` Mark Lorenzen
2004-10-19 5:03 ` jn
2004-10-19 7:51 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-10-19 8:47 ` Mark Lorenzen
2004-10-19 22:20 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-10-20 20:48 ` Mark Lorenzen
2004-10-21 8:23 ` Ole-Hjalmar Kristensen
2004-10-22 17:47 ` Mark Lorenzen
2004-10-23 12:07 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-11-25 0:22 ` Mark Lorenzen
2004-12-23 12:17 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-10-21 9:45 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-10-22 17:56 ` Mark Lorenzen
2004-10-23 11:55 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-10-19 15:55 ` jn
2004-10-19 22:11 ` Wojtek Narczynski
2004-10-20 5:42 ` jn
2004-10-19 21:35 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox