From: Samuel Tardieu <sam@rfc1149.net>
Subject: Re: smart pointer dangerous (no -> operator)
Date: Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:21:46 +0100
Date: 2009-01-18T13:25:02+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <874ozwby91.fsf@willow.rfc1149.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: gkpluq$vda$1@online.de
>>>>> "Oliver" == Oliver Kowalke <oliver.kowalke@gmx.de> writes:
Oliver> - returning it via access type :
Oliver> function Get(Pointer : Smart_Pointer) return Access_Object;
Why not use "return access Object" to get an anonymous access type,
on which Unchecked_Deallocation cannot be called without jumping
through hoops?
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@rfc1149.net -- http://www.rfc1149.net/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-18 12:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-16 10:04 smart pointer dangerous (no -> operator) Oliver Kowalke
2009-01-16 11:09 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-01-16 11:42 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-01-16 12:43 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-01-16 21:21 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-01-17 19:07 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-01-16 11:46 ` Oliver Kowalke
2009-01-16 12:45 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-01-17 0:43 ` Brian Drummond
2009-01-17 9:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-01-16 20:08 ` Tero Koskinen
2009-01-16 21:16 ` Maciej Sobczak
2009-01-18 12:21 ` Samuel Tardieu [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox