From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Subject: Re: Conditional compilation of debug traces without cpp
Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 21:07:51 +0200
Date: 2006-07-04T21:07:51+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <873bdhgpdk.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 44aaae35$0$5389$626a54ce@news.free.fr
guillaume.portail@grospied.enanglais.com writes:
> How may I organize the code to obtain the effect of having Debug.*
> calls being nulls when Debug.Enabled is False ?
You could place all calls to Debug.Put_Line inside a pragma Debug.
These are enabled only if you pass -gnata to GNAT; they are off by
default.
HTH
--
Ludovic Brenta.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-04 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-04 18:06 Conditional compilation of debug traces without cpp guillaume.portail
2006-07-04 19:07 ` Ludovic Brenta [this message]
2006-07-04 19:14 ` guillaume.portail
2006-07-04 21:39 ` Björn Persson
2006-07-04 21:43 ` guillaume.portail
2006-07-04 22:01 ` Björn Persson
2006-07-05 3:10 ` Matthew Goulet
2006-07-04 20:24 ` Gautier
2006-07-04 20:54 ` Simon Wright
2006-07-05 13:03 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-07-05 19:39 ` guillaume.portail
2006-07-06 5:53 ` Martin Krischik
2006-07-07 10:32 ` Stephen Leake
2006-07-07 14:08 ` M E Leypold
2006-07-06 7:59 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-07-06 20:25 ` guillaume.portail
2006-07-07 5:00 ` Matthew Goulet
2006-07-07 13:57 ` Thierry Bernier
2006-07-07 21:08 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox