From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: pragma Convention() Ada2012
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:37:14 +0200
Date: 2012-07-23T22:37:14+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87394iw6x1.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 23d960aa-3f5b-4710-aa9e-bbb1782bc54c@googlegroups.com
* Adam Beneschan:
> On Saturday, July 21, 2012 10:17:24 PM UTC-7, Shark8 wrote:
>> On Saturday, July 21, 2012 3:00:40 PM UTC-6, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> >
>> > I don't think this is possible in general because the entity has
>> > usually been frozen at that point.
>>
>> I think you're right; the Specification file *must* be able to provide the
>> correct information on generating subprogram-calls, which is impacted by
>> conventions, but I know you can put the convention-pragmas in the private
>> section.
>
> Yes, usually. I think Florian is confused.
Yes, I am. Thanks for setting me straight.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-26 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-21 19:16 pragma Convention() Ada2012 wlan.etho0
2012-07-21 20:09 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-07-21 20:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-21 21:00 ` Florian Weimer
2012-07-22 5:17 ` Shark8
2012-07-23 0:56 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-07-23 20:37 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2012-07-21 20:29 ` wlan.etho0
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox