From: Samuel Tardieu <sam@ada.eu.org>
Subject: Re: Compiler implementation of speciallized needs annexes.
Date: 1999/02/26
Date: 1999-02-26T13:59:24+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871zjdi7ur.fsf@zaphod.enst.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7b47q2$cnd$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
>>>>> "TED" == dennison <dennison@telepath.com> writes:
TED> Are they supposed to be able to? That would indeed be very cool,
TED> but I didn't get that impression reading the annex myself.
Well, nothing in the Annex requires (or even encourages!) this, but
other compilers could chose to use GNAT's PCS (Partition Communication
Subsystem, a.k.a the runtime library) in a compatible way.
Sam
--
Samuel Tardieu -- sam@ada.eu.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-26 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-24 0:00 Compiler implementation of speciallized needs annexes Robert T. Sagris
1999-02-24 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-02-24 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-02-25 0:00 ` robert_dewar
1999-02-25 0:00 ` JP Thornley
1999-02-25 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-25 0:00 ` dewar
1999-02-25 0:00 ` dennison
1999-02-26 0:00 ` Samuel Tardieu [this message]
1999-03-01 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-03-01 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-03-02 0:00 ` dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox