From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.cygnus.argh.org>
Subject: Re: What is wrong here? (Generic and controlled types)
Date: 2000/04/21
Date: 2000-04-21T05:40:22+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871z40j9kq.fsf@deneb.cygnus.argh.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8ci99q$tum$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Robert Dewar <robert_dewar@my-deja.com> writes:
> But you are right, probably the use of the term local or global,
> while not so technically accurate would be clearer.
>
> perhaps something like
>
> library (global) level
>
> might get the best of both worlds?
Maybe "global" isn't as helpful as it could be, I'm afraid. When you
have no idea about "library level", you probably don't know that a
declaration at library level is more "global" than one in the main
subprogram, either.
Perhaps "outmost package" instead of "global" is better?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-04-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-04-03 0:00 What is wrong here? (Generic and controlled types) Alexander Boucke
2000-04-03 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-04-03 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-03 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-04-03 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
2000-04-03 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-04-04 0:00 ` Alexander Boucke
2000-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-21 0:00 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2000-04-03 0:00 ` swhalen
2000-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-04 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-06 0:00 ` Mats Weber
2000-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-06 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-21 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-22 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-04-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-03 0:00 ` Ehud Lamm
2000-04-04 0:00 ` Alexander Boucke
2000-04-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox