From: Florian Weimer <Weimer@CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE>
Subject: Re: GNAT and Memory Maps?
Date: Sat, 05 Jul 2003 21:59:28 +0200
Date: 2003-07-05T21:59:28+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871xx4hhi7.fsf@Login.CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE> (raw)
In-Reply-To: pan.2003.07.05.03.42.01.638542.1720@nomail.com
Freejack <Freejack@nomail.com> writes:
> I've been picking through the GNAT docs (and Ada docs in general) in an
> attempt to figure out how/if and when/why the Ada compiler might choose to
> use an mmap system call in deference to a malloc/calloc or alloca call.
At least the publicly available GNAT versions completely rely on the
system's C run-time library for memory management. They do not go
below the malloc()/free() level.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-07-05 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-07-05 3:36 GNAT and Memory Maps? Freejack
2003-07-05 4:42 ` Freejack
2003-07-05 13:10 ` Ludovic Brenta
2003-07-05 23:24 ` Freejack
2003-07-08 1:40 ` John Kern
2003-07-08 8:20 ` Freejack
2003-07-08 14:56 ` Rod Chapman
2003-07-05 16:22 ` Simon Wright
2003-07-07 3:50 ` Hyman Rosen
2003-07-08 20:20 ` Simon Wright
2003-07-05 19:59 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2003-07-07 7:44 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox