From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Subject: Re: Emulating placement new
Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2012 20:48:01 +0200
Date: 2012-07-29T20:48:01+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871uju5rq6.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wcc6296h7ua.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com
* Robert A. Duff:
> Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
>
>> Is there a way to specify a storage pool (or something similar) on the
>> allocator, and not on the access type?
>
> Ada 2012 has such a feature. Instead of:
>
> X := new T'(This => 123, That => 456);
>
> which allocates in T's storage pool, you can say:
>
> X := new (My_Pool) T'(This => 123, That => 456);
>
> which allocates in My_Pool.
Interesting. But think this goes into the wrong direction. The owner
pool still controls the allocation, Allocate_From_Subpool dispatches
on the master pool, not the subpool. So I'd still need a special
access type type inject the owner pool.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-08-06 14:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-07-29 13:56 Emulating placement new Florian Weimer
2012-07-29 14:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-29 14:15 ` Florian Weimer
2012-07-29 14:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2012-07-29 15:00 ` Georg Bauhaus
2012-07-29 16:04 ` Robert A Duff
2012-07-29 18:48 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2012-07-29 19:14 ` Robert A Duff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox