From: FMOORE@eg.ti.COM (Freeman Moore - 575-3507)
Subject: Why one TYPE instead of the other?
Date: Fri, 25-Sep-87 09:16:00 EDT [thread overview]
Date: Fri Sep 25 09:16:00 1987
Message-ID: <8709260144.AA23613@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU> (raw)
Okay, I seem to be overlooking something:
type ONE is range 1 .. 10; -- type
or
type ONE is new INTEGER range 1 .. 10; -- derived type
Why/When should I use one definition form instead of the other?
Thanks for any input,
Freeman Moore
FMOORE%eg.ti.com@relay.cs.net
next reply other threads:[~1987-09-25 13:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1987-09-25 13:16 Freeman Moore - 575-3507 [this message]
[not found] <23613@ucbvax.Berkeley.EDU>
1987-10-02 20:33 ` Why one TYPE instead of the other? stt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox