* I will mail validated compiler list
@ 1987-09-23 12:19 Kenneth Ng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kenneth Ng @ 1987-09-23 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
Although I may end up regretting this, I will take requests for those
who wish the validated compiler list for about a week, and then will
do a massive mailing to those requesting it. A couple notes: the file
is over 64K, so I've heard that some mailers will choke on it. I will
not uuencode the file or compress it, because I have yet to see such
a program that will work transparently crossing EBCDIC/ASCII gateways.
Granted, I am working on a program which I hope will let me send files
through most mailers, but no one will even admit that their mailer has
bugs in it. Granted, some people (especially Unix(R) people) tend to
call these bugs "features".
Lastly, in your mail, please give your address. I've seen too many
mail messages having MUNG'ed return addresses, and I do not have the
patience or the time to figure out the proper return addresses. If
it matters any, figure out an address that will work with respect to
BITNET.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* I will mail validated compiler list
@ 1987-09-23 12:19 Kenneth Ng
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Kenneth Ng @ 1987-09-23 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
Although I may end up regretting this, I will take requests for those
who wish the validated compiler list for about a week, and then will
do a massive mailing to those requesting it. A couple notes: the file
is over 64K, so I've heard that some mailers will choke on it. I will
not uuencode the file or compress it, because I have yet to see such
a program that will work transparently crossing EBCDIC/ASCII gateways.
Granted, I am working on a program which I hope will let me send files
through most mailers, but no one will even admit that their mailer has
bugs in it. Granted, some people (especially Unix(R) people) tend to
call these bugs "features".
Lastly, in your mail, please give your address. I've seen too many
mail messages having MUNG'ed return addresses, and I do not have the
patience or the time to figure out the proper return addresses. If
it matters any, figure out an address that will work with respect to
BITNET.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~1987-09-23 12:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1987-09-23 12:19 I will mail validated compiler list Kenneth Ng
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1987-09-23 12:19 Kenneth Ng
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox