From: Laurent Guerby <guerby@acm.org>
Subject: Re: WinNT ADA compilers comparison
Date: 2000/07/26
Date: 2000-07-25T23:28:10+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86zon5aio7.fsf@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 397C03F9.AF6DF60F@cadwin.com
Nicolas Brunot <n.brunot@cadwin.com> writes:
> [...] If you are concerned by executable size for example, even with
> optimization and strip, for example, we get gnat executable size
> incredibly huge in comparison even with old ADA83 compiler (40 Mo
> instead of 8 Mo !!!) [...]
Hmmm, do you have lots of generics? If the old compiler implements
shared generics and given that GNAT doesn't, that could be a reason
for the size difference. BTW, did you try "-Os"? It asks GCC to try to
avoid optimizations that increase code size.
Also, what is the platform here?
--
Laurent Guerby <guerby@acm.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-07-26 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-07-20 0:00 WinNT ADA compilers comparison Nicolas Brunot
2000-07-20 0:00 ` Stephen Leake
2000-07-20 0:00 ` Pascal Obry
2000-07-20 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-07-20 0:00 ` Thierry Lelegard
2000-07-20 0:00 ` Lionel Draghi
2000-07-21 0:00 ` Nicolas Brunot
2000-07-22 0:00 ` Thierry Lelegard
2000-07-24 0:00 ` Nicolas Brunot
2000-07-25 0:00 ` G. de Montmollin
2000-08-02 0:00 ` n_brunot
2000-07-26 0:00 ` Laurent Guerby [this message]
2000-08-02 0:00 ` n_brunot
2000-08-02 0:00 ` gdemont
2000-08-03 0:00 ` n_brunot
2000-08-03 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-08-03 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-08-04 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-08-15 4:56 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-08-16 0:00 ` n_brunot
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox