comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu (David Starner)
Subject: Re: JAVA and ADA JGNAT
Date: 2000/01/26
Date: 2000-01-26T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <86n2lf$a2g1@news.cis.okstate.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: m3emb5gmeg.fsf@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no

On 26 Jan 2000 11:25:27 +0100, Preben Randhol <randhol@pvv.org> wrote:
>dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu (David Starner) writes:
>
>| But, in the context, I'd have to disagree. Many good products get
>| released early in the development cycle to the public, to no
>| harm to anyone. GCC, Linux, most open source projects, for
>                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
>Which is also a problem with a lot of open source software. That is a
>lot of them never makes it past the "I have a plan for a new app"
>announcement and then the project dies out. 

I'd disagree. The problem is not that they're open, but that nobody did
any work. It would have happened anyway, you just would never had heard
about it. Linux and Debian GNU/Linux are two examples of projects that
were open from the barest beginnings, and were successful partially
because of it.

>I think that one have overstressed the bazaar angle a bit to much. One
>needs to at least get to the stage where the program is reasonably
>usable to start attract users and then try to get more people to
>help. 

Usually. I think our definitions of reasonably usable are different,
though. Again, the Linux kernel was released at 0.0.1 and it worked
well enough to attract developers (which is what's important to the
success of a project, not users).

>As for compilers I think this is even more crucial. I would rather
>have a JGNAT that works well than an alpha product that makes the
>programs crash a lot and thus gets a bad reputation. 

Sure. But I'd rather have a JGNAT than no JGNAT. And I don't
find people getting much respect for complaining about a product
that was marked ALPHA. I don't think it will get a bad reputation
for alpha-class behavior as an alpha product.

>But it might be
>that I for general OS products expect them to be alpha or beta and
>crash a lot, I don't expect compilers to do the same. :-)

Then stop using the ones marked alpha or beta. I've seen very few
open source products not marked alpha or beta that were not stable,
and I've found many marked such that were. YMMV.

-- 
David Starner - dstarner98@aasaa.ofe.org
If you wish to strive for peace of soul then believe; 
if you wish to be a devotee of truth, then inquire.
   -- Friedrich Nietzsche




  reply	other threads:[~2000-01-26  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 61+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-01-18  0:00 JAVA and ADA JGNAT Mark Burge
2000-01-18  0:00 ` David Starner
2000-01-19  0:00   ` Ed Falis
2000-01-19  0:00     ` David Starner
2000-01-19  0:00       ` Ed Falis
2000-01-25  0:00   ` Robert Dewar
2000-01-25  0:00     ` Preben Randhol
2000-01-25  0:00       ` David Starner
2000-01-25  0:00         ` Robert Dewar
2000-01-26  0:00           ` Aidan Skinner
2000-01-27  0:00             ` Florian Weimer
2000-02-05  0:00             ` Robert Dewar
2000-01-26  0:00           ` Florian Weimer
2000-01-26  0:00             ` Gautier
2000-01-26  0:00               ` Florian Weimer
2000-01-26  0:00               ` David Starner
2000-02-05  0:00                 ` Robert Dewar
2000-01-26  0:00             ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
2000-01-26  0:00               ` Florian Weimer
2000-02-05  0:00                 ` Robert Dewar
2000-01-26  0:00               ` Pascal Martin
2000-01-26  0:00                 ` David Starner
2000-01-26  0:00                 ` Aidan Skinner
2000-01-27  0:00                 ` Jean-Marc Bourguet
2000-01-27  0:00                   ` Ted Dennison
2000-01-27  0:00                     ` Chris Morgan
2000-01-28  0:00                       ` Florian Weimer
2000-01-31  0:00                         ` Ted Dennison
2000-01-28  0:00                       ` Ted Dennison
2000-01-30  0:00                         ` Stefan Skoglund
2000-01-31  0:00                           ` Ted Dennison
2000-02-05  0:00                         ` Robert Dewar
2000-02-05  0:00                     ` Robert Dewar
2000-02-05  0:00                   ` Robert Dewar
2000-01-27  0:00                 ` Pascal Obry
2000-01-27  0:00                 ` Florian Weimer
2000-02-05  0:00                 ` Robert Dewar
2000-01-26  0:00           ` Alfred Hilscher
2000-01-26  0:00           ` David Starner
2000-01-31  0:00           ` Pascal F. Martin
2000-01-31  0:00             ` Preben Randhol
2000-01-31  0:00             ` reason67
2000-02-05  0:00             ` Robert Dewar
2000-02-05  0:00               ` Chris Morgan
2000-02-06  0:00               ` Pascal Martin
2000-02-06  0:00                 ` Robert Dewar
2000-02-06  0:00                   ` Aidan Skinner
2000-02-07  0:00                   ` Pascal Martin
2000-02-08  0:00                     ` Robert Dewar
2000-02-11  0:00               ` Wes Groleau
2000-01-26  0:00         ` Preben Randhol
2000-01-26  0:00           ` David Starner [this message]
2000-01-26  0:00             ` Preben Randhol
2000-01-26  0:00               ` David Starner
2000-01-27  0:00                 ` Preben Randhol
2000-02-05  0:00               ` Robert Dewar
2000-01-26  0:00           ` Ted Dennison
2000-02-05  0:00             ` Robert Dewar
2000-02-05  0:00           ` Robert Dewar
2000-01-19  0:00 ` Gautier
2000-01-19  0:00   ` Preben Randhol
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox