From: Maciej Sobczak <see.my.homepage@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: MQTT native Ada implementation
Date: Mon, 28 Mar 2016 00:35:39 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2016-03-28T00:35:39-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <86b6d1cc-a1db-4b53-8695-be47dceaee14@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9nrJy.127637$bx.64433@fx35.am4>
> Great
Yes.
> Then i cold discontinue the bindings
> https://github.com/persan/mosquitto-ada
> and pass them into oblivion.
No.
They have different licenses and this alone means that they have potentially different targets. Also, they have different underlying implementations, which means that they have potentially different sets of bugs and run-time parameters. There can be lots of reasons to use one variant over another.
Also, abandoned Ada libraries is a sign to the software community that Ada is giving up.
Also, competition is good. Why not compare them with some benchmark or something?
--
Maciej Sobczak * http://www.inspirel.com
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-28 7:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-24 19:15 MQTT native Ada implementation Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-03-26 8:03 ` Per Sandberg
2016-03-26 9:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2016-03-28 7:35 ` Maciej Sobczak [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox