From: Luke A. Guest <laguest@archeia.com>
Subject: Re: Ada for the next bare metal project?
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2015 23:42:17 +0000 (UTC)
Date: 2015-02-17T23:42:17+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <864028686445909242.436017laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ef104da8-968f-4448-a233-29c583c7e086@googlegroups.com
<droiddermo@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I have a tool chain built, apart from x86_64-elf-gdb as apparently this has
>> never been supported. So I'll be using the system one. I can provide you
>> with it and the basics for a zero footprint runtime.
> As for toolchain, I think I'll just go with mingw-w64 build (builds both x86 and
> x64 code), put all code in one section and cut it out with objdump. But I'd like
> to take a look at your zero footprint profile. What language features are
> missing, if I use zero footprint profile?
If you're doing is dev you should read the osdev wiki where it states you
should compile separate compilers for 32 and 64 bit builds as you might get
some strange surprises. You'll also find my ada barebones tutorial there
which outlines the basics you need Ina rts.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-17 23:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-16 16:40 Ada for the next bare metal project? droiddermo
2015-02-16 17:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-02-16 22:19 ` Luke A. Guest
2015-02-17 7:56 ` droiddermo
2015-02-17 23:42 ` Luke A. Guest [this message]
2015-02-18 10:29 ` Frédéric Praca
2015-02-23 22:45 ` brbarkstrom
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox