From: Oliver Kellogg <okellogg@my-deja.com>
Subject: Re: Ada95 bindings to Oracle
Date: 2000/01/18
Date: 2000-01-18T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <862jin$oho$1@nnrp1.deja.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 861rrv$d1$1@hobbes2.crc.com
In article <861rrv$d1$1@hobbes2.crc.com>,
"David C. Hoos, Sr." <david.c.hoos.sr@ada95.com> wrote:
> Are you referring to the OCI, or SQL*Module, or what?
The Pro*Ada predefined packages are Ada83 (is this called
"OCI" ?)
Package ORACLE is huge and uses a lot of nested packages,
this could profit from child packages.
The interfacing with C is the usual mess that it was
in Ada83, this could profit from pragma Convention (C),
Interfaces.C, the unsigned types in package Interfaces etc.
I've already substituted the non-portable semaphore
implementation with a protected type. <wax mode off>
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-01-18 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-01-18 0:00 Ada95 bindings to Oracle Oliver Kellogg
2000-01-18 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2000-01-18 0:00 ` Oliver Kellogg [this message]
2000-01-19 0:00 ` Pascal Obry
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox